|
|
Module 3:
Testing for Comprehension
Introduction
This final section tests for understanding
of positions and interests. Statements are presented
for identification as either a position or an interest.
There are three levels of difficulty:
|
The Basic and Moderate levels have two sets
of statements. You will receive immediate feedback on your
answers to judge how well you can apply the distinction
between positions and interests.
Readers can start at any level, but beginning
at the Basic or Moderate level is recommended. It is also
advisable to be able to correctly identify three out of
four statements for each set of questions at the Moderate
Level and to successfully complete either option at the
High Level to demonstrate competence in distinguishing between
positions and interests.
Basic Level
Testing for Understanding of Positions and Interests
Basic Level - Set One
Situation: A conflict among coworkers
about who should be the lead person on a new project.
-
-
George is best suited to lead the project
because he has the most seniority.
Position | Interest
-
I want to lead the project so I can
get the management experience to help me get a promotion.
Position | Interest
-
Maria should lead the project because
she has the best relationship with the organization
that donated the money for the project.
Position | Interest
Situation: The situation is a discussion
about what kind of flowers, bushes and trees should be
planted in the median of a major road in the city. A citizen
speaks in favor of having shade trees planted and the
City’s Public Works Director speaks against the
citizen’s idea.
-
Citizen: The city should plant only
shade trees in the medians.
Position | Interest
-
Citizen: Shade trees are more attractive
and provide shade for cooling the areas near the roads.
Position | Interest
-
Public Works Director: The city should
not plant shade trees in the medians.
Position | Interest
-
Public Works Director: Large shade
trees are hazards – cars might run in to them
and seriously hurt the drivers and passengers. The city
also has higher priorities for landscaping funds.
Position | Interest
Moderate Level
Testing for Understanding of Positions and Interests
Moderate Level - Set One
Situation: A town committee
discussing whether to have trash pick-up once or twice a
week.
-
-
The citizens want good services; they
want twice a week trash pick-up.
Position | Interest
-
We can extend the life of our sanitation
equipment if we have once a week trash pickup.
Position | Interest
-
Situation: a group deciding on new
rules for “welfare to work” program
-
We have to choose: either we invest
in job development training workshops or put people
in a workplace as entry-level workers – we can’t
do both.
Position | Interest
-
Because the options for childcare are
so limited, I don’t think the full-day job development
training workshops will work.
Position | Interest
-
David, your idea for 10 hours of training
a week for mothers with young children is totally unrealistic.
Position | Interest
-
What we need to do is increase welfare
recipients self-esteem, give them specific workplace
skills, and have adequate childcare arrangements.
Position | Interest
High Level -- Testing for Understanding
of Positions and Interests
In this test of comprehension of positions and interests,
you will read information about two people facing a negotiation.
Instead of looking at separate statements and deciding if
they are positions and interests, you will create your own
examples of positions and interests and compare them to an
answer key.
The negotiation is between the owner of Gorpen Construction
and a state Environmental Enforcement Department official.
This scenario was developed by Tom Taylor, Rafael Montalvo
and others at the Florida Conflict Resolution Consortium,
Used by permission of Tom Taylor – January 2004.
Some information is held in common by both negotiators, and
other information and ideas are specific to only one person.
Common Background Information
Gorpen Construction is a medium-sized residential developer
active throughout the southern part of the state. The state
Environmental Enforcement Department has been alerted to
the fact that Gorpen has used fill contaminated with petroleum
products in the construction of an access road for a large
new residential development in the town of Rootville. The
fill has been used principally to raise the road and allow
culverts to pass underneath, preserving the flow of two
small sloughs on site. The roadbed has been prepared, but
paving has been postponed until resolution of the uncertainty
surrounding the fill. The company which sold the contaminated
fill has gone bankrupt, and the principals appear to have
fled the country. Today's meeting is between representatives
of Gorpen and the Environmental Enforcement Department.
Its purpose is to determine whether Gorpen will be responsible
for the clean-up, and the amount of the fine, if any, which
Gorpen will have to pay.
Next, you’ll learn the views of the owner of Gorpen
Construction. After this information, you’ll be asked
to list the position(s) of the owner, and the owner’s
interests.
Assignment
1: Owner of Gorpen Construction: Confidential Information
Assignment
2: Environmental Enforcement Department official: Confidential
Information
Return to Top of this Module | Back to Module 2
|