In re C.S.L.B., 254 N.C. App. 395 (2017) (originally unpublished but subsequently published)

Held: 
Affirmed in Part
  • A court is not required to make findings under G.S. 7B-906.2(b) when it does not eliminate reunification as a concurrent permanent plan. The court did not eliminate reunification as a permanent plan when the permanency planning order was a primary plan of guardianship with a relative, which was ordered, and secondary plan of reunification.
Category:
Abuse, Neglect, Dependency
Stage:
Disposition (All Stages Post-Adjudication)
Topic:
Findings
Tags:
Click on a term below for additional case summaries tagged with the same term.