Magistrates Appointing Counsel?

Published for NC Criminal Law on May 08, 2009.

Last term, the United States Supreme Court decided Rothgery v. Gillespie County, available here.  As most folks likely know, before Rothgery, North Carolina law held that a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel "attached" when the defendant had his first appearance before a district court judge.  After Rothgery, it's clear that the right attaches at the defendant's initial appearance before a magistrate.   Since the initial appearance almost certainly isn't a "critical stage," though, Rothgery doesn't require that a lawyer be made available to the defendant before or during the initial appearance.  Most defendants, in most districts, have lawyers appointed at a first appearance that takes place within a day or two of the initial appearance, and that's very likely OK under Rothgery. However, misdemeanor defendants and out-of-custody felony defendants have no statutory right to a prompt first appearance, see G.S. 15A-601, and some districts do not provide such defendants with first appearances within a few days of arrest. Whether those districts are Rothgery-compliant isn't clear yet.  The Rothgery opinion requires that "counsel must be appointed within a reasonable time after attachment to allow for adequate representation at any critical stage before trial, as well as at trial itself," but doesn't define a "reasonable time." As an aside, one effect of Rothgery has been to change the rules for officers who wanted to interview out-of-custody defendants after the initial appearance but before the first appearance.  Previously, such defendants had neither a Fifth Amendment/Miranda right to counsel (because they weren't in custody) nor a Sixth Amendment right to counsel (because [...]