Skip to main content
  • About
  • Public Officials
  • Topics
  • Courses
  • Publications
  • Blogs
  • Resources
  • Giving
  • Knapp Library
  • MPA Degree
  • About
    As the largest
    university-based local
    government training,
    advisory, and research
    organization in the United
    States, the School of
    Government serves more
    than 12,000 public officials
    each year.
    • Mission and Values
    • News
    • Faculty and Staff
    • School of Government Foundation
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Visitor Information
    • Accessibility
    • Employment
    • SERVICE Mural
    • Our Impact
    • Browse by Role
      The School provides
      content and resources for a
      wide array of local
      government and judicial
      officials in North Carolina.
      Select your role to explore
      all related content.
      Local and State Government
      • Appointed Board Members
      • Attorneys
      • City and County Clerks
      • City and County Managers
      • Community and Economic Development Professionals
      • Elected Officials
      • Health and Human Services Professionals
      • HR Professionals
      • IT Professionals
      • Managers and Supervisors
      • Planning and Zoning Professionals
      • Tax and Finance Officials
      Courts and Judicial Administration
      • Appellate Court Judges
      • Clerks of Court
      • Criminal Defense Attorneys
      • District Court Judges
      • Guardians ad Litem
      • Indigent Defense
      • Jailers and Corrections Officers
      • Judicial Administrators
      • Juvenile Court
      • Law Enforcement Officers
      • Magistrates
      • Prosecutors
      • Superior Court Judges
    • Browse by Topic
      The School provides content
      and resources on a wide array
      of topics in local government
      and judicial administration in
      North Carolina.
      Select a topic to explore all
      related content.
      Local and State Government
      • State Government
      • Planning and Development Regulation
      • Community and Economic Development
      • Environment
      • General Structure and Authority
      • Health and Human Services
      • Human Resources
      • Information Technology
      • Intergovernmental Relations
      • Leadership and Management
      • Local Government Finance
      • Open Government
      • Other Local Government Functions and Services
      Courts and Judicial Administration
      • Civil Commitment and Guardianship
      • Civil Law and Procedure
      • Corrections
      • Criminal Law and Procedure
      • Evidence
      • Family Law
      • Indigent Defense
      • Judicial Administration and Authority
      • Juvenile Law
      • Motor Vehicle Law
    • Courses
      The School of Government
      offers up to 200 courses,
      workshops, webinars, and
      professional conferences
      each year.
      All Courses
      • Courses
      • Upcoming Courses
      • Online Modules
      • Webinar
      • Webinar Series
      • Continuing Professional Education
        Scholarship Opportunities
        Request a Transcript
      • Publications
        The School of Government
        publishes essential books,
        manuals, reports, articles,
        bulletins, and other print and
        online content related to state
        and local government.
        All Publications
        • Books
        • Book Chapters
        • Bulletins
        • Reports
        • Bulletin Series Index
          Publication Sales
        Browse
        • New Publications
        • Forthcoming Titles
        • Updates and Supplements
      • Blogs
        Faculty write for a number
        of School of Government
        blogs providing timely
        updates on emerging issues.
        • Coates' Canons: NC Local Government Law
        • Community and Economic Development
        • Death and Taxes
        • Environmental Finance
        • Facts That Matter
        • MPA Matters
        • North Carolina Criminal Law
        • On the Civil Side
        • Resources
          The School of Government
          offers information and
          services related to a wide
          range of topics relevant to
          government and judicial
          officials—in-person and on a
          variety of platforms.
          • Blog Posts
          • Timely updates on emerging issues
          • Centers and Services
          • Specialized training/research hubs and consulting services
          • Frequently Asked Questions
          • Aggregated answers to common questions on a variety of topics
          • Knapp Library
          • Print and online materials and research expertise
          • Legal Summaries
          • Brief descriptions of legal cases, bills, or legislative activity
          • Listservs
          • Information exchanges for peers and faculty experts
          • Microsites
          • In-depth or aggregated content for local government and judicial officials
          • Tools and Apps
          • Online and mobile tools for employees on-the-go
          • Master of Public
            Administration Program
            The UNC MPA program prepares public service leaders. The program is offered in two formats: on-campus and online.
            For more information, visit mpa.unc.edu
            MPA_Logo_Large_H_
              Why an MPA?
             
              Online or on-campus?
          • Giving
            The School of Government depends on private and public support for fulfilling its mission. Your gift will make a lasting impact on the quality of government and civic participation in North Carolina.
            • University Development
            • Make a Gift
            • Development FAQ
            • Knapp Library
              The Joseph Palmer Knapp Library houses a large collection of material on state and local government, public administration, and management to support the School's instructional and research programs and the educational mission of the Master of Public Administration program. Reference and research services are available to all residents of North Carolina, and additional assistance is available to state and local government personnel, both elected and appointed.
              • Covid-19 Response
              Resources | Legal Summaries

              Additional Information on the Establishment Clause

              David W. Owens
              August, 1997
              Legal topic(s)
              Summary: 

              The Supreme Court has in recent years engaged in a lively debate of the original meaning of the clause and there has also been considerable recent academic research on the origins and purpose of the Constitutional provisions on religion.[1] Justice Renquist[2] contends its original meaning was simply to prohibit the government from establishing a national religion or favoring one religion over another. Justice Souter,[3] joined by Justices Stevens and O’Connor, responded with a historical analysis supporting a reading of the Establishment Clause to prohibit even nonpreferential aid to religion. Justice Thomas[4] weighed in arguing in favor of neutral access by religious groups to government funding and programs.

              Tests

              The Supreme Court has struggled somewhat unsuccessfully for the past quarter century to set forth clear guidelines to determine whether the Establishment Clause had been violated. Much of this time the court has used the three part test set forth in 1971 by Chief Justice Burger in Lemon v. Kurtzman[5] as its analytic framework:

              1. Does the statute have a secular legislative purpose?[6]
              2. Is its principal or primary effect one that neither advances nor inhibits religion?
              3. Does the statute foster an excessive entanglement with religion?

              Though frequently criticized, an alternative formulation to the Lemon test has proven difficult to fashion. Factors such as the neutrality of the statute in terms of its effect on religion and whether the statute endorses religious views have been suggested.

              However, as Justice O’Connor has noted, it may be neither necessary, possible, or even desirable to fashion categorical rules that would resolve close questions regarding the Establishment Clause. She noted in that cases on the margins of the Establishment Clause are often best decided on the basis of careful judging of case specific facts rather than on categorical rules. "When bedrock principles collide, they test the limits of categorical obstinacy and expose the flaws and dangers of a Grand Unified Theory that may turn out to be neither grand nor unified."[7]

              Applications

              Numerous Supreme Court cases have addressed alleged Establishment Clause violations. Some of the key cases, grouped by topics, include:

              Expenditure of tax dollars at parochial schools

              • Agostini v. Felton, 65 U.S.L.W. 4524 (June 23, 1997) (upholding provision that sends public school teachers into parochial schools to provide remedial education);
              • Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, 512 U.S. ___ (1994) (invalidating creation of special public school district tailored to serve a Hasidic Jewish community as singling out a particular religious group for favorable treatment);
              • Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, 509 U.S. 1 (1993) (provision of sign language interpreter for child in parochial school does not violate Establishment Clause where the service is provided neutrally to all qualifying students in sectarian/non-sectarian, public or private school);
              • Mueller v. Allen, 463 U.S. 388 (1983) (tax deduction for parochial schools valid);
              • Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971) (payment of teachers of secular subjects in parochial schools invalid); and
              • Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947) (reimbursement of transportation costs to public and parochial schools valid).

              Use of school facilities by religious groups

              • Rosenberger v. University of Virginia, 115 S.Ct. 2510 (1995) (viewpoint neutrality requires upholding allocation of student fees for publication by religious group as well as other student organizations);
              • Lamb’s Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District, 113 S. Ct. 2141 (1993) (upholding after hours use of school facilities by religious as well as other civic groups); and
              • Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 (1981) (public university may not exclude religious groups from use of facilities made available to all other student groups).

              Prayer in public schools

              • Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992) (including clergy led prayers in graduation ceremonies invalid);
              • Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985) (moment of silence for prayer invalid);
              • Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980) (mandatory posting of Ten Commandments invalid);
              • Abington v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) (state sponsored Bible reading and recitation of Lord’s Prayer invalid);
              • Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962) (daily reading of state composed non-denominational prayer invalid); and
              • Illinois ex re. McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948) (invalidating "release time" for offering religious instruction in public schools.)

              Erection of religious displays on public property

              • Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette, 515 U.S. ___, 132 L.Ed.2d 650 (applying an "endorsement" test in upholding cross display by KKK on Ohio Capitol Square)
              • Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668 (1984) (municipal display of nativity scene along with other secular holiday symbols valid).

              Mandatory closing of businesses on Sundays.

              • Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 (1961) (upholding Sunday closing law).
              • McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (1961) (upholding Sunday closing law as having a legitimate secular purpose)

              The North Carolina supreme court has also upheld Sunday closing laws against a claim that it aided in the establishment of Christianity and discriminated against those whose religions prescribed a different Sabbath or day of rest.[8]

              1. See, e.g., Philip A. Hamburger, A Constitutional Right of Religious Exemption: An Historical Perspective, 60 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 915 (1992); Philip B. Kurland, The Origins of the Religion Clauses of the Constitution, 27 WM & MARY L. REV. 839 (1986); Douglas Laycock, ‘Nonpreferential’ Aid to Religion: A False Claim About Original Intent, 27 WM & MARY L. REV. 875 (1986); Michael W. McConnell, The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion, 103 HARV. L. REV. 1409 (1990).

              2. Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38, 91-107 (1985) (dissenting opinion).

              3. Lee v. Weisman 505 U.S. 577, ___ (1992)
              (concurring opinion).

              4. Rosenberger v. University of Virginia, 132 L.Ed.2d 700, 730-37 (1995) (concurring opinion).

              5. 403 U.S. 602, 612-13 (1971).

              6. The Court explicitly noted that land use restrictions usually fall into this category. Id. at 612-14. In First Assembly of God v. City of Alexandria, 739 F.2d 942 (4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1019, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held the conditions in a special use permit for a that limited enrollment in a church day school to pre-school through ninth grade and a required erection of a fence and a landscaped buffer between the school and the surrounding neighborhood had a strictly secular purpose and therefore did not violate the Establishment Clause.

              7. Rosenberger v. University of Virginia, 132 L.Ed.2d 700, 730 (1995) (concurring opinion).

              8. Raleigh Mobile Home Sales, Inc. v. Tomlinson, 276 N.C. 661, 174 S.E.2d 542 (1970); Clark’s Greenville, Inc. v. West, 268 N.C. 527, 151 S.E.2d 5 (1966); State v. Smith, 265 N.C. 173, 143 S.E.2d 293 (1965); State v. McGee, 237 N.C. 633, 75 S.E.2d 783, appeal dismissed, 346 U.S. 802 (1953); State v. Weddington, 188 N.C. 643, 125 S.E. 257 (1924) (permissible to ban Sunday sale of Coca-Cola as part of meals that could be sold); State v. Medlin, 170 N.C. 682, 86 S.E. 597 (1915) (permissible to limit Sunday hours of sale of non-essential items in drug stores). The authorization for municipal Sunday closing ordinances continues as N.C.G.S. 160A-191. State law also mandates no alcohol sales before noon on Sundays. N.C.G.S. § 18B-1004(c).

              Faculty Coordinators

              individual image for David W. Owens
              David W. Owens
              Gladys Hall Coates Professor of Public Law and Government
              owens@sog.unc.edu

              See Also

              Land-Use Regulation of Religious Uses
              • About the School
              • Faculty and Staff
              • Events Calendar
              • Driving Directions
              • Knapp Library
              • Employment
              • Contact Us
              • Gladys
              • Employee Intranet
              • UNC Home Page
              • Employee Login
              • Information Technology
              • Registration Account Portal
              • Accessibility
              • UNC Privacy Policy
              Knapp-Sanders Building
              Campus Box 3330, UNC Chapel Hill
              Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330
              • T: 919.966.5381
              • F: 919.962.0654
              © Copyright 2025,
              The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill