Although I have a couple of more scholarly posts ready to go, there have been enough intriguing news stories over the past several days that I couldn't resist doing another news roundup. First, returning to a topic I blogged about here, a Texas inmate has just been convicted of having a cell phone in prison . . . and sentenced to 60 years, consecutive to his existing sentence. You can read the story here. It makes S167, the cell-phones-in-prisons legislation that just passed in the North Carolina Senate, available here, seem very, very mild. Second, returning to a topic I blogged about here, a New Jersey case has resulted in two analyses of breathalyzer source code being conducted -- one by the state, and one by the defense. Readers will be shocked to learn that the two analyses reached different conclusions, with the state's analysis finding that the device, despite some coding problems, "will reliably produce consistent test results," and the defense's analysis finding problems so severe that the breathalyzer should be removed from use. The story's here, but note that the breathalyzer in question is not the same model as the one used in North Carolina -- in fact, it's built by a different company. Third, in a world full of idle speculation about possible Supreme Court nominees, our own News and Observer has produced some idle speculation about who will be named the next United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina -- a job that may [...]
Faculty Coordinators
