How do the laws addressing essential services, mandated services, and accreditation compare to each other?
All of these laws address the provision of public health services and identify some of the services that must be provided, but there are significant differences between the lists of services. Further, none of the laws provides a comprehensive list of every service that a local public health agency is legally obliged to provide. Some examples of other laws that require or affect local public health services are here. Beyond that, public health agencies may provide additional services that aren’t reflected in any law.
Law is not the only determinant of the types of services that local public health agencies provide or the activities they engage in. Public health services are also influenced by changing public health conditions or changing funding streams for public health agencies. For example, in the early 2000s a series of unrelated events—including the anthrax letter attacks of 2001 and the emergence of new illnesses such as SARS—resulted in increased attention to public health preparedness. North Carolina’s essential services law was amended in 2009 to include public health preparedness,[1] but by then work in that area was already well underway, driven by both need and an infusion of federal funds intended for preparedness efforts.
The determination about which public health services are provided is also influenced by deliberative processes, in which researchers, practitioners, and other stakeholders review information about public health and reach conclusions about the services that are necessary to produce good population health outcomes. The ten essential public health services that are reflected in North Carolina’s local health department laws were the result of one such process.[2]
More recently, on April 10, 2012, the national Institute of Medicine (IOM) released a report which, among other things, defines a minimum package of public health services. While the minimum package was based on the ten essential public health services, it is more specific about the foundational capabilities and basic programs that, according to the authors of the report, “no health department can be without.”[3] Although the minimum package approach is not presently reflected in North Carolina law, it will likely be a factor in future policy discussions regarding local public health. Thus, it offers an organizing principle for looking at North Carolina public health services that may be useful. Table 4 identifies the services and activities from each of the three North Carolina law and a fourth non-legal source—a list of services that appears in a biennial survey of local public health agency activities. It then associates those services and activities with the two components of the IOM’s minimum package:
- Foundational capabilities
- Information systems and resources, including surveillance and epidemiology
- Health planning, including community health improvement planning
- Partnership development and community mobilization
- Policy development, analysis, and decision support
- Communication, including health literacy and cultural competence
- Public health research, evaluation, and quality improvement
- Basic programs
- Maternal and child health promotion
- Injury control
- Communicable disease control
- Chronic disease prevention, including tobacco control
- Environmental health services
- Mental health and substance abuse services
Some services or activities identified in NC law or the biennial survey are listed more than once in each column, as they relate to more than one of the IOM categories.
Table 4. NC Public Health Services and the IOM’s Minimum Package of Public Health Services
Minimum Package: Foundational Capabilities | |||||||
Foundational Capability | NC essential services law | NC mandated services laws | NC accreditation requirements | Services assessed in DHHS biennial survey | |||
Information systems & resources |
|
|
|
| |||
Health planning |
|
|
|
| |||
Partnership development and community mobilization |
|
|
|
| |||
Policy development, analysis, and decision support |
|
|
|
| |||
Communication |
|
|
|
| |||
Public health research, evaluation, & quality improvement |
|
|
|
| |||
Minimum Package: Basic Programs | |||||||
Foundational Capability | NC essential services law | NC mandated services laws | NC accreditation requirements | Services assessed in DHHS biennial survey | |||
Maternal & child health promotion |
|
|
|
| |||
Injury control |
|
|
|
| |||
Communicable disease control |
|
|
|
| |||
Chronic disease prevention |
|
|
|
| |||
Environmental health |
|
|
|
| |||
Mental health & substance abuse |
|
|
|
| |||
Other Public Health Services/Activities in North Carolina | |||||||
Service/ Activity | NC essential services law | NC mandated services laws | NC accreditation requirements | Services assessed in DHHS biennial survey | |||
Personal health programs not reflected in minimum package |
|
|
|
| |||
Dental public health |
|
|
|
| |||
Public health laboratory |
|
|
|
| |||
School health |
|
|
|
| |||
Public health preparedness |
|
|
|
| |||
Workforce and agency support |
|
|
|
| |||
Local agency governance – activities of the local board of health |
|
|
|
| |||
^ This item is listed more than once in this column.
*This program was transferred to another state agency in FY 2011–2012.
*** This program was abolished in FY 2011–2012.
[1]S.L. 2009-442, sec. 1.
[3]. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Public Health Strategies to Improve Health, For the Public’s Health: Investing in a Healthier Future (2012). Pre-publication PDF version available at www.iom.edu.