State v. Hensley, ___ N.C. App. ____, 802 S.E.2d 744 (Jun. 20, 2017)

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting a more complete version of a detective’s notes after the defendant opened the door by asking about one portion of those notes. The court rejected the defendant’s argument that it was improper to admit the notes under Rule 106 (remainder of or related writings or recorded statements) because the State’s request to do so was not done contemporaneously with the original cross-examination of the detective. The court went on to find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion under Rule 403 in admitting the notes.