State v. Harris, ___ N.C. App. ___, 800 S.E.2d 676 (May. 2, 2017)

The trial court did not err by allowing the introduction of a video recording of the State’s witness being interviewed by law enforcement as substantive evidence where the statement fell within the Rule 803(5) hearsay exception for past recollection recorded. The court rejected the notion that the video had been introduced to refresh the witness’s recollection.

Error | UNC School of Government

Error

The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.