State v. Norman, 213 N.C. App. 114 (Jul. 5, 2011)

The trial court did not err by allowing a lay witness to testify that the defendant was impaired. The witness formed the opinion that the defendant was impaired because of the strong smell of alcohol on him and because the defendant was unable to maintain balance and was incoherent, acting inebriated, and disoriented. The witness’s opinion was based on personal observation immediately after the collision. 

Error | UNC School of Government

Error

The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.