State v. Ray, 197 N.C. App. 662 (Jul. 7, 2009)

rev’d on other grounds, 364 N.C. 272 (Aug. 27, 2010)

The trial court did not err in admitting the State’s expert witness’s testimony that the results of his examination of the victim were consistent with a child who had been sexually abused; the expert did not testify that abuse had in fact occurred and did not comment on the victim’s credibility.