State v. Richmond, 215 N.C. App. 475 (Sept. 6, 2011)

The evidence supported the trial court’s finding that based on an officer’s training and experience, he immediately formed the opinion that a bulge in the defendant’s pants contained a controlled substance when conducting a pat down. The officer was present at the location to execute a search warrant in connection with drug offenses.

Error | UNC School of Government

Error

The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.