State v. Waring, 364 N.C. 443 (Nov. 5, 2010)

The trial court did not err by failing to intervene ex mero motu during closing argument in the sentencing phase of a capital trial when the prosecutor asserted that defense counsel’s mitigation case was a “lie” based on “half-truths” and omitted information.

Error | UNC School of Government

Error

The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.