State v. Woodard, 210 N.C. App. 725 (Apr. 5, 2011)

In a case involving charges arising out of a drug store break-in in which controlled substances were stolen, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting 404(b) testimony from an accomplice that a few days before the break-in at issue, the same perpetrators broke into a different pharmacy but did not obtain any narcotics. The incidents were sufficiently similar, occurred only a few days apart, and involved the same accomplices.

Error | UNC School of Government

Error

The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.